![]() ![]() For some popular things there are many different torrents packed together in different ways. There don't seem to be any rules regarding duplication, quality control or content packing either. ![]() There are no standards for torrent naming so naming conventions vary wildly, descriptions are equally unregulated and disorganized varying from great to non-existent. It does have lots of categories which is nice, but I don't think the torrent organisation is good at all. Visually it is unappealing and looks messy and amateurish. What I don't like though is the organisation and layout of the site. The ratio system isn't really a problem though, it works pretty well. However, since having lots of seeders isn't important but always having at least one so that the torrent doesn't die is, I feel the system should reflect that and incentivise seeding torrents with few/no seeders more. The bonus point system is already set-up for a ratioless system and getting bonus points/upload credit is so easy that it may as well be ratioless.īeing so easy to maintain ratio is good for an Ebook site because Ebooks are small and so not many seeders are required. I like that it is so easy to maintain ratio, but I don't understand why the site doesn't just switch to a ratioless system. Ok, well, I joined MyAnonamouse and I have to say. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |